History revisited - Part 2 – A sense of deja- vu?
As reported to the US Congress in
1786:
We took the liberty to make some inquiries concerning the Grounds of
the their pretentions to make war upon Nations
who had done them no Injury, and
observed that we considered all mankind as our friends who had done us no
wrong, nor had given us any provocation.
“The ambassador # answered us that [the right] was founded
on the Laws of the Prophet, that it was written in their Koran, that all
nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that it
was their right and duty to make war
upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every ‘Mussulman’
who should be slain in battle was
sure to go to Paradise.”[ # Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdrahaman ]
The whole letter can be read here and makes interesting reading.
The Barbary coast consisted of several kingdoms, Morocco, Tripoli,
Tunisia and Algeria.
In 1780’s, the new United States encountered
a very hostile force, in the form of the Barbary pirates. Since the Islamic conquest of North Africa in
the Middle-Ages, these Muslim pirates habitually captured foreign ships, looted
cargo, carried out razzias, demanded ransom money for prisoners and also took slaves
for the North African & Middle Eastern markets. They
were literally adhering to the following Quranic verse:
“Whenever you encounter the ones who disbelieve [during wartime], seize
them by their necks until once you have subdued them, then tie them up as
prisoners, either in order to release them later on, or also to ask for
ransom, until war lays down her burdens.”
As can be seen from the
Ambassador’s statement, it was a state-sponsored act of warfare. Slave-raiding was a lucrative business, both
in terms of slaves and also payment of “protection-money” in the form of tributes.
Although
Morocco, one of the Barbary states recognised the independence of the U.S.A in
1777, it was nevertheless the first north African state to a capture US ship,
(in 1784).
As result of the pirate acts
& on the advice of Spain, the U.S.A signed several “peace treaties”;
however, it was obliged to pay tributes to ensure the safety of its shipping in
the Eastern Atlantic and also the Mediterranean. This state of affairs
continued for over 15 years. Eventually, the US refused to pay the extremely
large tribute (aka, extortion money), which was about 10% of the U.S.
government annual revenue, so the Pasha of Tripoli declared war on the U.S.A.
US Marines in Tripoli, 1804 |
By this time, the U.S.A, under
the leadership of President Jefferson, decided to send the re-established US
Navy and Marines to the North African state. US naval officers such as Stephen
Decatur fought in this conflict, known as the Tripolitan War or the First
Barbary War. In 1804, Admiral Horatio
Nelson is said to have called one particular naval battle "the most bold
and daring act of the age."
The US Navy joined the Swedish
navy and blocked the port of Tripoli for over This was a hugely significant event for the
new U.S. It was huge event for the US
Marines as well, as this is the same “shores of Tripoli” as in the US Marine’s Hymn! Despite this, hundreds of US citizens were
taken captive and enslaved by the North African Muslims until 1815.
3 years, until the Pasha of
Tripoli signed a peace treaty with the U.S, promising not to take US ships.
By 1807, the promise made by the Pasha was
broken, as Barbary pirates started to attack US shipping once more, but this
time, the focus of action was based in Algiers. Once more, the US Navy headed
off to North Africa & engaged in several battles with the Algerian
Navy. Once more, Stephen Decatur fought
off the Barbary coast. The U.S. Navy reached Algiers and threatened it with
destruction. Not surprisingly, Algiers capitulated and signed a peace treaty
with U.S., returning captured U.S. ships and U.S. captives.
North African “white slavery” was
not finally eradicated until Algiers was taken by the French in 1830. More shockingly, Islamic “black slavery” was
not officially eradicated until Saudi Arabia abolished it in 1962.
"Yet his words are virtually identical to those spouted ad nauseum by jihadists today who justify their bellicosity as a reaction to these U.S.-centric factors, which were nonexistent in Adja's time."
ReplyDeletehttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/ali-a-rizvi/an-atheist-muslims-perspective-on-the-root-causes-of-islamist-jihadism-and-the-politics-of-islamophobia_b_3159286.html